Skip to main content
TKOSolutions

Healthcare transformation & operating model advisory

Make complex healthcare change executable.

Large healthcare transformations rarely fail because nobody is working. They fail because the outcome is distributed across dozens of teams, systems, decisions, and dependencies—and therefore owned by nobody end to end. TKO becomes the integration and operational-truth layer that closes that gap.

The point of view

Every part has an owner.
The whole does not.

Reporting depends on an execution system that someone has to establish first: who owns what, what depends on what, which decision is stuck, and whether ready means anything.

20+ years in regulated operations

  • Apollo Global Management, regulated operations and exception handling
  • Sapient, institutional platform transformation
  • ELLKAY, CMS Cures Act and FHIR interoperability
  • Cognizant, healthcare transformation and payer operations
  • Full career record

Each role is publicly verifiable on LinkedIn.

The recognizable problem

Healthcare operating models were not designed for today’s pressure.

Providers expect less friction. Regulators expect faster action. Leaders expect lower cost. Technology teams are being asked to deploy AI. The controls still matter.

01

Administrative friction

Manual review, duplicate work, rework, escalation, provider burden, and cost accumulate across workflows nobody sees end to end.

02

Operating-model transformation

Roles, controls, decision rights, segmentation, exception handling, and governance must be redesigned before technology can improve them.

03

Technology and governed AI

Workflows, rules, data, integrations, automation, and human review have to operate as one accountable decision system.

04

Execution and recovery

Hidden dependencies, fragmented ownership, release collisions, and local green status prevent complex programs from converging.

How TKO engages

Land with a bounded question. Expand only when the evidence supports it.

Every engagement defines the objective, scope, deliverables, access, client responsibilities, exclusions, and the decision for handoff or expansion.

  1. 01

    Diagnose

    Executive Diagnostic

    What is actually happening, and what should leadership examine next?

    1–2 weeks
    Starting at $5K

    Details
  2. 02

    Diagnose

    Transformation Diagnostic

    What is preventing this transformation from becoming an executable operating change?

    2–3 weeks
    Starting at $10K

    Details
  3. 03

    Design

    Operating Model & Transformation Design Sprint

    What should the future operating model be, and how can the enterprise implement it?

    4–6 weeks
    Starting at $20K

    Details
  4. 04

    Lead

    Transformation Execution Authority

    Who is accountable for the outcome end to end when it is distributed across dozens of teams, systems, decisions, and dependencies?

    Scope-dependent
    Starting at $20K/month, ranging to $50K/month by complexity

    Details

Why Todd Kovalsky

The work happens between specialties.

I'm Todd Kovalsky, Founder and Principal of TKO Solutions. I work where healthcare operations, provider experience, technology, controls, governance, and implementation collide, and I have been the integration point across business, operations, technology, compliance, finance, provider workflows, testing, and production readiness on deadline-driven enterprise programs.

  • 20+ years across regulated operations, enterprise transformation, product, and implementation
  • Healthcare experience across payer operations, provider workflows, prior authorization, UM, and interoperability
  • Delivery environments involving dozens of applications and workstreams
  • Governance contexts involving more than 100 cross-functional participants
  • A live governed decision system I designed, built, and run myself

What this is not

You already have a PMO. This is a different job.

A program office collects and reports what teams say. The execution layer establishes whether what they say is complete, connected, owned, current, and sufficient to support go-live. Both are necessary. They are not the same work.

Collects workstream status

Reconstructs enterprise truth

Tracks reported dependencies

Finds the dependencies nobody reported

Records assigned owners

Finds the work with no accountable owner

Reports red, yellow, green

Tests whether status is supported by evidence

Escalates overdue actions

Identifies the unresolved decision preventing closure

Produces dashboards

Creates executive decision intelligence

Coordinates meetings

Drives cross-system convergence

Reports readiness

Establishes what ready means, then tests it

Explore the Approach

Principal-led healthcare advisory

Bring the messy problem.

What is changing? What is stuck? Where is the burden? Which teams and systems are involved? Start there.