Skip to main content
TKOSolutions

Client or enterprise experience / Healthcare

Prior Authorization Workflow Design Experience

Administrative work and exceptions were being discussed as an automation problem before the review tiers and escalation paths were explicit.

What this is

Client or enterprise experience

My role

I contributed healthcare workflow, product, governance, and transformation experience inside enterprise operating environments.

Why it matters here

It shows why I begin with a measured workflow and exception baseline before assessing whether software, staffing, or AI is the answer.

1. Buyer or operating context

Healthcare operations spanning prior authorization, utilization management, provider-facing work, compliance, technology, and clinical review.

2. Triggering problem

Administrative work and exceptions were being discussed as an automation problem before the review tiers and escalation paths were explicit.

3. What was breaking

Routine handling, exceptions, human review, audit requirements, and payer/provider coordination were intertwined rather than designed as distinct workflow states.

4. Why conventional approaches were insufficient

Adding automation to an undefined workflow would have preserved inconsistent routing and hidden decision rights.

5. My role

I contributed healthcare workflow, product, governance, and transformation experience inside enterprise operating environments.

6. Intervention

The work decomposed the workflow into review tiers, exception paths, escalation, audit requirements, and human decision points before considering machine assistance.

7. Evidence or result

The operating requirements and control boundaries became explicit enough to support a responsible implementation decision, with review tiers and escalation paths defined before machine assistance was considered.

8. Why this matters to a prospective buyer

It shows why I begin with a measured workflow and exception baseline before assessing whether software, staffing, or AI is the answer.

Evidence record

What can be supported publicly.

Documented experience across prior authorization, utilization management, provider operations, compliance logic, and payer/provider workflow complexity.
Specific artifacts included workflow tiers, escalation logic, audit requirements, and adoption considerations.
Limits of this evidence

Employment-period experience, described anonymously. Confidentiality covers the client identity, workflow artifacts, baselines, and post-implementation measures, so I do not publish them. The evidence supports scope and mechanism, not a quantified client outcome.

How to read this evidence

Program Recovery Conversation

Bring one program under pressure.

The Program Recovery Review establishes what is actually wrong with one program, separates symptoms from addressable causes, and gives leadership a 90-day action plan.