KD-040 · Architecture
Evidence → Asset Traceability
Show how a published authority asset resolves back to its admitted evidence and claim guard through the existing TIF Asset workflow.
- Evidence level
- Verified
- Executive audience
- Reviewer, editor, executive buyer
- Publication status
- Published after human review
Inspect the operating model
Rendering diagram…
Text alternative and Mermaid source
Evidence → Asset Traceability. Show how a published authority asset resolves back to its admitted evidence and claim guard through the existing TIF Asset workflow. Business problem: Content cannot withstand diligence if its public statement cannot be traced to an artifact, evidence record, and explicit boundary. Claim boundary: Internal TIF operating model. It describes the implemented review and traceability design, not autonomous publication, a knowledge graph, or a claim about external outcomes.
flowchart LR
C[Capture or approved source] --> E[Evidence]
E --> O[Asset opportunity]
O --> A[Versioned asset]
A --> K[Knowledge diagram]
K --> D[Derivative or consuming asset]
A --> G[Human status gate]Why this matters
Content cannot withstand diligence if its public statement cannot be traced to an artifact, evidence record, and explicit boundary.
Executive decision
- Require each asset to carry linked Evidence, version history, human status, and explicit links to its consuming diagram or derivative work.
Claim boundary
Internal TIF operating model. It describes the implemented review and traceability design, not autonomous publication, a knowledge graph, or a claim about external outcomes.
Evidence summary
rachelos:ev-rachelos-human-approved-ai
AI drafts and recommendations wait in a dedicated operator queue for human review before anything is sent.
Boundary: Enforced in code, not promised. No send-rate metric.
healthcare:ev-healthcare-human-api-dependency
Across prior auth, UM, care management, interoperability, regulatory, and transformation work, the same root cause recurs: critical operational knowledge lives inside individuals instead of governed systems.
Boundary: Advisory experience; the through-line for all healthcare proof. Pattern not metric.